DOWNTIME TRACKING · LOST HOURS

Downtime tracking that explains the stop, not just counts it

Most downtime reports are a well-formatted argument about who was at fault last month.

THE SHORT ANSWER

Downtime tracking captures every stop, its duration and its cause. Manual reason codes are where it fails: operators pick the fastest button, not the true one. Useful tracking captures the stop automatically from machine data, infers the plausible cause from how the machine behaved before it, and connects the loss to the plan that now has to absorb it.

WHY DOWNTIME DATA IS RARELY TRUSTED

01

Reason codes are a popularity contest.

Ten buttons, one shift, a queue behind the machine. The code chosen is the one closest to the thumb. Six months later the analysis blames the top three codes, which were only the top three buttons.

02

Minutes are counted, patterns are not.

Knowing that line 2 lost 180 minutes tells you nothing about whether it lost them the same way each time. The repeated micro-stop that becomes a breakdown never appears in a monthly total.

03

The report lands after the decision.

Downtime that arrives on Monday for last week cannot change last week's schedule. It becomes a meeting topic instead of a planning input.

The market counts lost minutes.

Atherya explains where they came from, and replans around the next ones.

WHAT ATHERYA DOES INSTEAD

01

Capture without a button.

Stops are detected from the machine's own signals in the historian, PLC/SCADA tags and MES records — the data your plant already writes — so the record does not depend on who was free to classify it.

02

Cause with evidence.

A stop is placed in context: the recipe running, the shift, the behaviour that preceded it, and the comparable events in the machine's history. You get a candidate cause you can challenge, with the signals attached.

03

Micro-stops stop hiding.

Short repeated stops are invisible in a monthly total but obvious against a machine's learned normal. They are usually the cheapest hours in the plant to recover.

04

The loss reaches the plan.

When a stop or a predicted failure changes feasibility, Atherya proposes the revised maintenance and production plan and waits for your sign-off.

READ FROM ONE REAL PLANT — BEFORE INSTALL

6years of raw history6Mreadings · 42 machines · 5 families141machine × recipe signatures98 → 7open questions closed from data

Rubber moulding, northern Italy. Figures from a real onboarding, read from existing data before any installation. Anything beyond them is a scenario, and we declare it as a scenario.

WHAT A REAL READ FOUND

  • Six years of history, roughly 6 million readings, 42 machines across 5 asset families — read before any installation.
  • The plant's losses were not evenly spread: 60.8% of the bottleneck sat on the presses, and the plant's real average utilisation was 47% while the best machine ran far above it.
  • The same recipe produced 5.9% more output on the night shift. Nobody had catalogued it, because no report compared a machine with itself.

What makes Atherya different

Most predictive maintenance tools score signals. Atherya builds an operational memory of the plant first, then reasons on top of it — with the evidence in plain sight and the decision left to a person.

Operational memory

Every event, anomaly, intervention and shift becomes shared memory. What was a log yesterday is experience tomorrow, and the model reads new signals against it.

Déjà Vu: it has seen this before

Not just "anomaly detected", but when it already happened, how similar it was, how it evolved and which action worked. The senior maintainer's memory, available to everyone.

Context that kills false alarms

Machine defects, weak points, how the crew actually works and the environment around the line. A deviation that is normal for that machine, that shift or that season stays quiet.

Living FMEA

FMEA, manuals and procedures become an active part of the reasoning: causes, effects, sensors and suggested actions are connected, instead of sitting in a document nobody opens.

Explainable, not magic

Every alert arrives with the signals involved, the comparable history, the failure mode and a confidence level. Data, interpretation and decision stay separate and verifiable.

It acts, with your sign-off

Atherya does not stop at the warning: it proposes the maintenance window against real orders and shifts, and replans when something changes. Nothing is applied until a person approves it.

On the data you already have

It works on PLC, SCADA, MES, ERP, maintenance records and feedback as they are — fragmented and legacy included. Sensors are added only where no existing signal carries the degradation.

One brain, not a maintenance silo

Maintenance, production and planning read the same operational state, so a predicted failure immediately becomes a scheduling question instead of a separate dashboard.

QUESTIONS, ANSWERED

Straight answers.

What is downtime tracking software?

Software that records when equipment stops, for how long and why, then aggregates those stops into availability and loss analysis. The stronger systems capture stops automatically from machine data instead of relying entirely on operator reason codes.

Why are operator reason codes unreliable?

Because classifying a stop competes with restarting the line. Under pressure the fastest acceptable code wins, so the data describes button placement as much as it describes the plant.

Can downtime be tracked without new hardware?

In most plants, yes. PLC and SCADA tags over OPC-UA, SQL historians and MES records already contain the state changes needed to reconstruct stops. Atherya starts there.

What about micro-stops?

They are the ones worth finding. Individually they are too short to log, collectively they are a shift. They surface when each machine is compared with its own learned normal rather than with a threshold.

Does the analysis change the schedule automatically?

It proposes the change and shows the trade-off. Nothing moves in the plan without a human approving it, and every approval is auditable.

YOUR PLANT · YOUR DATA · THE PROOF

Find out what your stops actually were.

One export of existing machine data is enough for the first read.

Discover Atherya